There is no "grey area" in drink driving sentencing. There is only a cliff edge. Unlike speeding, where you can argue "exceptional hardship" to avoid a ban, drink driving carries a mandatory minimum disqualification of 12 months. It does not matter if you will lose your job. It does not matter if you are the sole carer for a disabled relative

 There is no "grey area" in drink driving sentencing. There is only a cliff edge. Unlike speeding, where you can argue "exceptional hardship" to avoid a ban, drink driving carries a mandatory minimum disqualification of 12 months. It does not matter if you will lose your job. It does not matter if you are the sole carer for a disabled relative

 There is no "grey area" in drink driving sentencing. There is only a cliff edge. Unlike speeding, where you can argue "exceptional hardship" to avoid a ban, drink driving carries a mandatory minimum disqualification of 12 months. It does not matter if you will lose your job. It does not matter if you are the sole carer for a disabled relative

 There is no "grey area" in drink driving sentencing. There is only a cliff edge. Unlike speeding, where you can argue "exceptional hardship" to avoid a ban, drink driving carries a mandatory minimum disqualification of 12 months. It does not matter if you will lose your job. It does not matter if you are the sole carer for a disabled relative

 There is no "grey area" in drink driving sentencing. There is only a cliff edge. Unlike speeding, where you can argue "exceptional hardship" to avoid a ban, drink driving carries a mandatory minimum disqualification of 12 months. It does not matter if you will lose your job. It does not matter if you are the sole carer for a disabled relative